Optimization Analysis

Dispersion Analysis

Phase, GD, GDD, DGD analysis for pulse broadening and chromatic dispersion

This page covers the dispersion detector group: Phase, GD (Group Delay), GDD (Group Delay Dispersion), and DGD (Differential Group Delay). These detectors are used for pulse broadening evaluation, chirp compensation coating design, PMD (Polarization Mode Dispersion) assessment, and chromatic dispersion budget analysis. The current software does not expose Phase / GD / GDD / DGD as direct optimization targets. The standard workflow is Run -> Sweep -> Results.

Relevant result pages:

Example Setup

The following screenshots show the structure and optics configuration used for dispersion analysis:

Prerequisites

ConditionCurrent requirement
Detector activationEnable one or more of Phase, GD, GDD, DGD in Optics > Dispersion
Wavelength modeSweep mode required; Single and Average modes do not produce dispersion spectra
Structural coherenceFully coherent stack recommended; incoherent layers may degrade the physical meaning of phase-based quantities
Cone AngleNot supported for dispersion detectors
Analysis entryRun and Run Sweep
Optimization entryNo direct Phase / GD / GDD / DGD target is currently available

Physical Definitions

DetectorDefinitionUnit
Phase (φ)Spectral phase of the transmitted or reflected complex amplituderad
GDGroup Delay: first derivative of phase with respect to angular frequency, GD = −dφ/dωfs or ps
GDDGroup Delay Dispersion: second derivative of phase, GDD = d²φ/dω²fs² or ps²
DGDDifferential Group Delay: difference in group delay between s- and p-polarization componentsfs or ps

GD describes the delay experienced by a pulse envelope. GDD describes how different frequency components experience different delays, leading to pulse broadening. DGD quantifies polarization-dependent delay differences relevant to PMD.

Application Scope

ScenarioMain questionRecommended detectorsRecommended sweeps
Pulse broadening in ultrafast opticsDoes the coating introduce excessive GDD that broadens femtosecond pulses?GDD, Phasestructure layer thickness, wavelength range
GDD compensation coating designCan the layer thicknesses be tuned to produce a target GDD profile?GDD, GDstructure layer thickness
PMD evaluation in telecom coatingsIs the DGD within acceptable bounds across the operating band?DGD, GDoptics/incidentAngle, structure layer thickness
Chromatic dispersion budgetWhat is the total GDD contribution of this coating in the system?GDD, Phasewavelength range extension
Phase ripple analysisAre there rapid phase oscillations that degrade pulse fidelity?Phase, GDwavelength step refinement

Common Problems and Diagnostics

ProblemSymptomRecommended action
Excessive GDDPulse broadening beyond tolerance in the target bandSweep layer thicknesses to find a GDD minimum; verify with Phase continuity
Uncontrolled DGDPolarization-dependent pulse distortionSweep incidentAngle and pRatio to isolate the angular sensitivity; check at normal incidence first
Phase rippleRapid oscillations in Phase or GD spectraReduce wavelength step for finer sampling; check whether ripple correlates with thin-layer interference
Low confidence at spectral edgesGD and GDD values show large fluctuations near the wavelength range boundariesExtend the wavelength range beyond the region of interest; edge artifacts from numerical differentiation are expected
GDD sign ambiguityConfusion between positive and negative chirpVerify the sign convention by comparing with a known dispersive substrate
GD and GDD are computed from numerical differentiation of the spectral phase. Results near the edges of the wavelength range may exhibit increased noise. Extend the wavelength range beyond the region of interest to reduce edge artifacts.
GoalSweep parameterExpected output
GDD sensitivity to layer thicknessstructure/{layer}/thicknessGDD spectrum family; identify thickness values that flatten or invert GDD
Phase continuity checkWavelength step refinement (decrease step size)Smoother Phase curve; confirm absence of phase jumps
Angular dependence of DGDoptics/incidentAngleDGD vs. angle; identify the angular range with minimal PMD
Multi-layer GDD optimization preparationMultiple layer thicknessesParameter sensitivity map for downstream manual or R/T/A-based optimization

Result Review Order

Start by checking the Phase page to verify phase continuity:

Then focus on the GDD page to quantify the pulse broadening contribution:

StepDetectorPurpose
1PhaseVerify phase continuity; identify spectral regions with smooth vs. rapid phase variation
2GDConfirm group delay profile; identify delay peaks and flat regions
3GDDQuantify pulse broadening contribution; locate GDD zero-crossings and sign changes
4DGDEvaluate polarization mode dispersion; confirm acceptable DGD across the operating band
5Reflectance / TransmittanceBack-check energy performance; confirm that dispersion optimization does not degrade spectral targets

Relation to the Optimizer

ItemCurrent status
Direct Phase / GD / GDD / DGD optimizationNot supported
Indirect approachUse Sweep to identify parameter sensitivity, then optimize R / T / A with Curve Fit or Scalar goals to achieve the spectral profile that corresponds to acceptable dispersion
optics variables as optimization variablesNot exposed in the current UI
R / T / A back-checkRecommended after any dispersion-driven parameter adjustment
Although dispersion detectors cannot be used as direct optimization targets, the Sweep analysis identifies which structural parameters most strongly affect GDD. Use that information to define the optimization variable set and constrain the R/T/A optimization to a parameter region with acceptable dispersion.

Conclusion Boundaries

  • The current software supports Phase, GD, GDD, and DGD prediction and sweep-based parameter sensitivity analysis.
  • The current software does not support direct optimization toward a target GDD or DGD value.
  • Dispersion results require wavelength Sweep mode; they are not produced in Single or Average mode.
  • Cone Angle averaging is not applied to dispersion detectors.

Case Study Entry

For full structures and workflows, see Case Studies. Future cases will cover GDD compensation for ultrafast mirror coatings, PMD evaluation for telecom filter stacks, and chirped mirror design.

Next Step

If the problem involves system-level reflectance or transmittance targets, return to RTA and Layer Absorption Analysis. For full application workflows, proceed to Case Studies.

Copyright © 2026 Dreapex